Link to Home

Madhya Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation Limited

 

  Link to Home

4 Development Objectives & Strategy
4 Agriculture & Allied Services
4 Industry
4 Information Technology
4 Tourism
4 Biotechnology
4 Education
4 Public Health & Family Welfare
4 Labour
4 Urban Development
4 Roads
4 Power
4 State Finances
4 Economic Development Board

 

Economic Development Policy

STATE FINANCES

Continue.....

MACRO-ECONOMIC TRENDS

The state of Madhya Pradesh was ranked 11th among the 14 major states in Gross State Domestic Product in 1998 (The World Bank). In terms of per capita income (Rs.2205 in 1996-97) too, it occupied the eleventh position in the nineties decade (India - Policies to Reduce Poverty and Accelerate Sustainable Development, The World Bank Jan 31. 2000). Table shows the growth of the state’s GSDP in recent times.(Trend analysis in this chapter has been carried out from 1993-94 onwards, using the new series of GSDP figures as per the revised methodology of the Central Statistical Organisation.)
  
Gross State Domestic Product of Madhya Pradesh (In Rs. Cr.)
  1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99 CAGR
Current prices 52752 58610 65800 75345 81042 90736 11.5%
1993-94 prices 52752 54291 57156 60849 61427 65520 4.4%
Source: NIC
Table portrays the declining share of the primary sector and the emergence of the tertiary sector as the leading contributor to the state’s economy for the future.
 
Share of various sectors to the state’s GSDP at Current Prices (in %)
  1993-94 1994-95 1995-96 1996-97 1997-98 1998-99
Primary 41 39 37 38 36 37
Secondary 24 25 26 25 26 26
Tertiary 34 35 35 36 37 36
Total 100 100 100 100 100 100
Source: NIC
 
OVERVIEW OF THE FISCAL SITUATION
 
The state of Madhya Pradesh has been under substantial fiscal stress, as exhibited by the following factors:
 
» Revenue expenditure has been growing at much faster rate compared to that of revenue receipts.
 
» Continual increase in the volume of public debt and interest payments.
 
» Decline in financial assistance from the centre.
 
» Negligible return in the short term on investments in Social services, Public enterprises and Co-operatives and the increasing dependence of such institutions on the state administration for financial assistance.
 
The state’s total expenditure grew 2.7 times from Rs.5898.75 Cr. in 1990-91 to Rs.15968.32 Cr. in 1998-99. During the same period the revenue expenditure increased almost three times from Rs. 4746.10 Cr. to Rs.14217.63 Cr., while for capital expenditure the growth has been one and a half times from Rs. 1152.64 Cr. to Rs. 1750.68 Cr. The corresponding growth in revenue receipts was 2.5 times from Rs.4545.4 Cr.  to Rs.11345.9 Cr..

The situation has particularly worsened since the implementation of the Fifth Pay Commission recommendations for Government employees. Increase in salaries and wages were estimated to have imposed an additional burden of the order of Rs. 1800 Cr. for the period Jan.1996 to March 2000. Further, the additional liability on account of enhanced dearness allowances were estimated to exceed Rs. 500 Cr. during the same period (Memorandum submitted to the Eleventh Finance Commission, GoMP, Mar. 1999)
.
 

Fiscal Deficits of MP

Source: Finance & Account Statistics, GoMP, & State Finances: A Study of Budgets, RBI various issues


The above situation is reflected clearly in the skewed fiscal deficit figures shown in
Fig
ure and Table. The state’s Gross Fiscal Deficit (GFD) has risen from Rs.1019.3 Cr. in 1990-91 to about Rs.4126.7 Cr. in 1998-99, before reducing slightly to Rs.3973.2 Cr. in 1999-00. In terms of fiscal indicators, MP’s GFD had been hovering below 2.5% of GSDP in the mid nineties, which was consistently better than the average of other states during the same period. However, while the GFD of all states combined has sharply increased to 3.8% (India - Policies to Reduce Poverty and Accelerate Sustainable Development, The World Bank Jan 31, 2000) in 1998-99 post the implementation of the Fifth Pay Commission recommendations, MP’s deficit has grown alarmingly to 4.55%. The trend has been almost similar in case of revenue and primary deficits, where MP’s figures for 1998-99 have been 3.16% and 2.53% respectively compared to figures of 1.9% and 1.8% for all states’ (op.cit.).
 

Summary of Main Fiscal Trends of Madhya Pradesh
(% of GSDP)

  1993-94   1994-95   1995-96   1996-97 1997-98 1998-99  
Total Expenditure 16.83 15.89 16.08 17.38 17.55 17.60
-  Revenue Exp. 14.25 13.32 13.88 15.21 14.47 15.67
-  Capital Exp. 2.58 2.57 2.20 2.16 3.08 1.93
Total Revenue Receipts 13.40 13.00 13.15 13.29 13.89 12.50
-  Own Revenue 7.74 7.65 8.05 8.07 8.12 7.59
-  Central Transfers  5.67 5.34 5.10 5.22 5.77 4.91
Revenue Deficit 0.85 0.33 0.73 1.92 0.58 3.16
Gross Fiscal Deficit 1.86 2.42 2.48 2.56 2.25 4.55
Primary Deficit   0.22 0.55 0.72 0.73 0.20 2.53
Debt Outstanding (end of year)
-  to Centre 8.96 8.95 8.80 8.74 9.49 10.23
-  to Financial Institutions. 2.19 2.88 3.23 3.64 4.23 4.62
-  to Provident Funds 6.38 6.59 6.63 6.47 6.67 6.67
-  Total 17.86 18.42 18.66 18.84 20.38 21.53
(Source: Analysed from Finance & Account Statistics of MP for various years, White Paper on Economic and Financial Status in Madhya Pradesh, Feb. 1999)
The sharp rise in fiscal deficit leads to unsustainable borrowing programmes by the government.

FINANCING THE FISCAL DEFICIT

The fiscal deficit is largely financed by three sources, namely
» Loans from the Central Government
» Borrowings from the market (institutions and the public)
» Borrowings from the Public account (provident funds etc.)
 
In the year 1999-00, 47% of the gross fiscal deficit of Rs.3973.2 Cr. has been financed by loans from centre, market borrowings accounted for 14% while the balance 39% came from other sources. The corresponding percentages for all states were 42.1, 12.5 and 45.4 (State Finances: A Study of Budgets of 2000-2001, RBI, Dec. 2000) respectively.

Table shows that in the second half of the nineties decade the outstanding market borrowings for financing fiscal deficit has increased significantly to almost 21.5% of the total debt.
 

 Profile of Debt Liabilities of Madhya Pradesh

 

1993-94

1994-95

1995-96

1996-97

1997-98

1998-99

Total Stock of Debt (Rs. Cr.)

9420.88

10797.76

12281.13

14198.24

16517.42

19531.39

Loans from Centre (%)

50.18

48.58

47.14

46.38

46.54

47.54

Loans from Market (%)

14.08

15.64

17.33

19.31

20.75

21.48

Loans from Public Account (%)

35.74

35.79

35.35

34.31

32.71

30.98

Interest payment as % of public Debt

9.71

10.82

10.04

10.39

10.81

10.36

Interest as % of Revenue receipts

12.28

14.36

13.38

13.74

14.75

15.07

State’s Loans & Advances (Rs. Cr.)

2791.22

3143.61

3439.33

2897.04

2594.26

2803.48

Net Loan Liability (Rs. Cr.)

6629.66

7654.15

8841.80

11301.20

13923.16

16727.92

Source: White Paper on Economic and Financial Status in Madhya Pradesh, 1999 & Memorandum submitted to the Eleventh Finance Commission, 1999.
The compounded annual growth rate of total debt has also been a disconcerting 9.54% in between 1993-94 and 1997-98. The rate of interest payments as percentage of total debt as well as of revenue receipts has shown a rising trend, and with further upwardly revision of interest rates by the RBI, the situation is expected to worsen further.

The amount of public debt has increased almost threefold between 1990-91 and 1998-99. Borrowings from the centre have increased annually at the rate of 12.35% in the last decade. In terms of proportion to the total repayment, interest obligation has risen from around 28% in 1990-91 to 34% in 1996-97. The interest component was reported to be the fastest growing item in the expenditure, with annual growth rates of about 21% and elasticity of 1.32 in relation to GSDP. Expenditure on general services was the second fastest growing item, at 16.9 % annual growth rates and elasticity of 1.08
(Report on Madhya Pradesh Public Finance Reform – ADB TA 2943-IND).


Debt as a percentage of NSDP for Madhya Pradesh has been around 22-23%.  Though the figures are favourable compared to states like UP and Rajasthan, the difference with the leading states is easily perceptible from Table. The share of debt servicing for MP has been around 7-8% of the NSDP in the period 1987-88 to 1996-97. More than one third of revenue expenditure has consistently been spent towards debt servicing, and the share has been rising alarmingly towards 40% in the middle of the last decade.
 

Debt to NSDP Ratio for selected states  (as %)

 

1990-95

1995-99

Andhra Pradesh

21.7

22.2

Gujarat

22.4

18.6

Karnataka

20.3

18.6

Madhya Pradesh

23.9

22.5

Maharashtra

15.3

13.7

Rajasthan

30.6

31.5

Tamil Nadu

19.2

17.7

Uttar Pradesh

30.1

29.9

(State Finances: A Study of Budgets of 2000-2001, RBI, Dec. 2000)

 

Continue.....