Link to Home

Madhya Pradesh State Industrial Development Corporation Limited

 

  Link to Home

4 Development Objectives & Strategy
4 Agriculture & Allied Services
4 Industry
4 Information Technology
4 Tourism
4 Biotechnology
4 Education
4 Public Health & Family Welfare
4 Labour
4 Urban Development
4 Roads
4 Power
4 State Finances
4 Economic Development Board

 

Economic Development Policy

MP ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD
INTRODUCTION

To realise the vision of a progressive Madhya Pradesh the government must spearhead the implementation process. It shall kick start and catalyse development to attract inflow of private investments. There is a compelling need to execute development initiatives expeditiously and ensure effective utilisation of the scarce resources. The State shall therefore constitute a nodal agency to oversee and de-bottleneck the development process. The Economic Development Board shall be the nodal agency.

STRUCTURE AND COMPOSITION OF THE EDB

The Economic Development Board shall be chaired by the Chief Minister and comprise of select members of the cabinet and officers of the rank of Principal Secretary to the Government of MP. A Project Planning and Monitoring Unit (PPMU) headed by the Chief Secretary shall be set up as a part of the EDB to plan and monitor project implementation for both private and public funded projects. Select large investment or critical public investment infrastructure projects shall be overseen by the EDB. Infrastructure projects, identified by the various departments as showing potential for private involvement on a BOT/ BOOT/ other format and with a minimum investment of Rs. 10Cr. shall be referred to the EDB.

MPSIDC shall be appointed as the implementing / facilitating agency for public-private partnership projects within the EDB since it has accumulated significant experience in privatising infrastructure projects and has also been the co-promoter of the country’s first private toll road project. In the light of its revised role it may be renamed as the
Madhya Pradesh Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation (MPSIIDC).

Proposed structure of the Economic Development Board


To meet the funding requirements in the infrastructure sector, it is desirable to induce private capital on a large scale. However, privatisation of the infrastructure sector across the country has progressed fairly slowly. At present, individual departments identify and prepare projects for private investment. To expedite the privatisation process, it will be necessary for the GoMP to create a readily available pool of relevant project development skills within a single agency. A technical cell shall be set up under MPSIIDC to carry out techno-commercial feasibility studies project structuring and preparation of draft concession agreements, etc., as part of project development. The body shall outsource skills extensively from the private sector in the project development process. The technical cell would thus need to be funded perhaps by multilateral agency grants to be able to attract the best talent from the private sector. MPSIIDC shall be able to recover its project development expenses from the successful bidder at the time of award of concession.

ROLE OF THE EDB

This EDB shall expedite the process of policy development, identification and sanctioning of key projects and finally, monitoring their progress. In all of this a strong programmatic approach will be critical to the success of the venture.

The domain of the EDB would encompass the following sectors.:
» Rural and agricultural infrastructure
» Industrial Infrastructure
» Services Infrastructure
» Core Infrastructure (Transportation, Energy, Urban Infrastructure)
» Social Infrastructure
» Fiscal Reform

The recommended functions of the Economic Development Board are:
» Laying down the sectoral agenda for implementation by various departments.
 
» Monitoring of policy implementation. The responsibility of implementing the projects will be on the department.
 
» To facilitate and monitor infrastructure development in the state.
 
» To expedite the process of project identification and sanctioning within the state.
 
» Institutionalising privatisation across sectors by incubating and cross fertilising experiences.
 
» Project preparation and feasibility studies with a view to privatisation.
 
» Monitoring of public and private projects by the Project Planning and monitoring Unit (PPMU). EDB will have a supervisory and non-implementation role only.
 
» Resolution of interdepartmental issues for infrastructure projects.
 

As one of its first tasks, the Board shall undertake to produce a comprehensive Infrastructure Blueprint for the state, along the lines of the “Gujarat Infrastructure Agenda – Vision 2010” produced by the Gujarat Infrastructure Development Board.

METHOD OF EMPOWERMENT

In order to vest sufficient powers with the EDB to enable it to carry out the duties envisaged for it, the GoMP may need to enact the necessary enabling legislation as herein provided.
» The Infrastructure Privatisation Act, 2001 shall be enacted, by which departments may refer infrastructure projects to the Board:

»

For all projects to be implemented with investment from the private sector, and involving project investment greater than Rs.10 Cr.
» For all projects involving public investment greater than Rs.25 Cr.
 
» The Rules of Business of the Government of Madhya Pradesh may need to be suitably amended so that
» Projects to be privatised may be referred to the EDB for preparation activities
 
» Recommendations of the EDB on project structuring for private projects shall be binding on the departments
 
» Interdepartmental disputes on implementation of projects falling in the above two classes shall necessarily be referred to the Board, and the decisions of the Board shall be binding on the departments
 
» In case of disputes between departments and private sector partners, the private investors may approach the Board for speedy resolution of issues
 
» The Board shall utilise these powers thus vested with it in order to ensure that:
» Projects put up for private sector participation are well studied and prepared and bidding processes are transparent and efficient
 
» Project selection and implementation is in keeping with overall state infrastructure policy
 
» Interdepartmental issues are resolved speedily so as not to hinder project implementation
 

INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATISATION ACT, 2001

The Government of Madhya Pradesh is committed to privatisation of infrastructure in the state and introduction of a user-to-pay regime.

In order to institutionalise the process of privatisation of infrastructure within the state, the GoMP shall create well defined and transparent processes for project preparation, appointment of consultants, award of project concessions and sharing of risk. The GoMP shall lay down these processes within a statutory framework that makes these methodologies mandatory for all project privatisation efforts by government departments and the EDB. It is perceived that a transparent framework for public-private partnerships would provide a degree of comfort to potential private investors in infrastructure projects.


Accordingly, the state shall enact an Infrastructure Privatisation Act to facilitate privatisation of infrastructure projects. The Infrastructure Privatisation Act will lay down guidelines for privatisation of projects on a BOT/ BOOT/ BOO/ other commercial basis. The act shall pertain to infrastructure projects of minimum size Rs.10 Cr. The act shall incorporate:
» Formats for privatisation which are covered under the act.
 
» Procedures to be followed for competitive bidding out of projects.
 
» Procedure for referring project preparation activities to the EDB.
 
» Procedures to be followed in case of unsolicited bids received for project ideas.
 
» List of mandatory studies and procedures to have been completed prior to bidding out.
 
» Mandatory inclusions in project concessions:
» Obligations of the government particularly with regard to clearances and land acquisition
» Lender securities
» Forms of state support
» Indication of risks to be necessarily addressed and allocated in the project concession
» Project termination conditions
» Dispute resolution mechanism